|
efilmcritic.com - : Yes, most horror sequels are nothing more than get-rich-quick schemes, and MANY of those sequels are awful films. But there's a big difference between 'cookie-cutter sequels' and this ghoulish affair. Not only is this an atrociously awful movie, but throughout the entire running time, all you'll be thinking about is how, in Hollywood, death is considerably less important than those big box-office receipts that only a sequel can offer. more...
|
1/5
|
|
www.moria.co.nz - : This is the second sequel to Poltergeist (1982). It is certainly better than the first sequel, Poltergeist II: The Other Side (1986), although that isn't really saying much. And it isn't particularly good. But the director this time around is Gary Sherman, who had previously made Death Line/Raw Meat (1972), which has a minor cult in some places, as well as the smalltown zombie film Dead & Buried (1981) and subsequent to this, the psycho-thriller Lisa (1990). more...
|
2/5
|
|
www.joblo.com - : The first Poltergeist is probably one or better yet THE best ghost movie ever made. Part 2 didn’t top it and neither does this last installment. I originally saw this film in the theaters and although it has many flaws I always go back to it. I watch it at least twice a year. I don’t know if it’s the mirror stuff, Heather O'Rourke’s last performance or because it’s the end of the Poltergeist series…I always go back to it. more...
|
2.5/
|
Critic Reviews
