|
www.filmcritic.com - : It's almost understandable that John Carpenter made Halloween III without Michael Myers -- or any actual reference to the first two films. Why? Well, Mikey burned to a crisp at the end of Halloween II. And lord knows, people can't just get back up and start killing after they burn into oblivion. The story this time out involves an evil toymaker, cursed masks, and the potential death of every child hunting for Halloween candy. The masks have little bits of one of the rocks from Stonehenge in them. If only our hero can stop the ''kill'' signal from being sent to the masks on Halloween night! more...
|
1/5
|
|
www.toxicuniverse.com - : The third entry couldn't be written as a continuation of the Michael Myers and Laurie Strode saga. Instead, it was decided that the Halloween franchise would take on a direction more closely resembling TV's The Twilight Zone than the Friday the 13th film series. more...
|
2/5
|
|
efilmcritic.com - : Many wrote it off as a badly made film, but the real beef was that there was no Michael Myers present anywhere in the flick. It canned Carpenter’s original idea, and that’s really too bad, as Halloween 3 is a wonderfully entertaining and incredibly spooky little film that has its share of flaws, but manages to surpass them at nearly every turn. more...
|
5/5
|
Critic Reviews
